A Call to Science Bloggers
Posted on November 9th, 2012 in Force11, Interoperability, Jonathan Cachat, News & Events | 5 Comments »
With the growth of scientist participation in blogging and social networks, a considerable amount of meritable scientific chatter is unfolding online. Several prominent blogs have emerged, in fact NIF is now indexing may of these sites (via RSS feeds) and can be found in the Multimedia data type***.
In our continued effort to integrate and link data, NIF would like to create two-way links between your blog posts and the scientific articles they discuss through NIF Literature. For example, if users find an article in NIF Literature we can provide links to blogs or tweets that have discussed this article, in addition to the current link to full text access options. Your site or blog would also be included on PubMed search results thank’s to NIF automated LinkOut feature services.
However, it is currently very hard to achieve this goal and would require substantial manual curation efforts. In order to automate this process, we submit a few simple guidelines to the online science community.
1) Blogs and other long-form posts should always include related PubMed Identifiers (PMID) in citations. References can be in text, or placed together at the end of a post, but either way should include PMID: ######## for all citations. This standardized format of ‘PMID:######’ was suggested by the BioDBcore and biosharing.org initiatives and we strongly support it.
- This is a MindHacks post without any citation information at all (aside form a link to Nature) – this is the worst possible scenario, for the purposes of this article. It is a wonderful dialogue on this exciting article, but very unlikely that people reading this article will ever know that this post exists – unfortunate for everyone involved.
- This Neuroskeptic post correctly included citation information, along with the PMID, at the end of the post (see Screenshot below).
2) Short-form posts should include PMIDs when possible, particularly if linked directly to article. For example a recent tweet here.
3) Be found – index with search engines including NIF. For more information about submitting your site, blog or resource to NIF check here or fill in the small form here.
The internet was designed to enable a web of links between ideas, information and people. Following these simple guidelines will not only increase the connectivity between data, the social and semantic links are also valuable to information creators. First, it promotes more opportunities for scientific exchange and feedback. Secondly, it provides additional avenues to calculate impact metrics – similar to those observed by AltMetrics.org and PloS Journals.
Do you have any other thoughts related to increasing data integration and interpretability? Share them here in the comments below!
***If you would like to have your blog or site included within the NIF index drop us a line – info@neuinfo.org



5 Responses
Good suggestions, happy to comply! In addition to PMID, what about including DOI links? And what about pre-publication (or e-pub ahead of print) papers that aren’t yet indexed on PubMed? It’s not uncommon for a blog to review a paper hot of the e-press, where it’s being announced via ScienceDirect, for example, but isn’t yet in the usual databases. Related to that, I also notice that arXiv (which I’ve started to use recently!) doesn’t offer DOI links, nor are its articles included in PubMed. Such “pre-publication” sites are of particular interest to bloggers trying to accelerate the discourse, so presumably they should be wholeheartedly included!
note that the citation in the neuroskeptic post was manually generated to register the post with ResearchBlogging.com
another effort to register scientific articles is http://scienceseeker.org/
might it be more sensible to scrape these resources for posts which you could then co-register? e.g. from http://researchblogging.com/post-search/list/tag_id/226 & http://scienceseeker.org/posts?type=post&filter0=blog&modifier0=topic&value0=Neuroscience
Thanks!!!
These are great suggestions.
I think that DOIs are just fine, there are resolvers for these so going back and forth between DOIs and PubMedIds is relatively easy. Though it is a little easier to work with PubMedIds.
We will need to look at scienceseeker. It should be possible to grab the links between published work and blogs from there. I would love to get these links into PubMed itself to make the articles at NLM a little more lively.
Hi NIF, I just noticed that a PMCID (PubMed Central) will be available in mid-2014 for an article I’m reviewing for a blog post. After a little bit of research, e.g. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/about/faq/, it looks like there will soon be yet another way to link to an article!
According to the speedily scanned FAQ, the PMCID will have the advantage of including things like book reviews that aren’t covered in PMID. Looking ahead, then, with arXiv already an issue for me and with, perhaps, a desire to categorize some other online resources (especially blogs), one wonders whether a more general approach using a DOI isn’t best? Whatever ends up getting used most will probably “win,” although it would be nice if we could anticipate future developments before getting too entrenched in any one behavior.
I’d be keen to see PubMed and others start to include DOI in their own online resources, but that’s beyond my powers! Since DOI is already used by some “pre-publication” services, such as ScienceDirect, it offers a major benefit for bloggers. If arXiv and its ilk join that party it would start to look like DOI has all the momentum, at which point would we not be better off defaulting to DOI on the basis that it isn’t medium- or field-specific? Do we really care if we’re linking to a blog post, a YouTube video, a published journal article or an online “pre-publication” server? Likewise, with the interdisciplinary nature of all of science, not just neuroscience, it may be difficult for even PMC to encompass all that is important to NIF. For instance, I am working on an article with physicist colleagues that will probably go to J Appl Physics, but it’s describing hardware that would be of interest to the neuroimaging community. Whither PubMed on J Appl Phys?
“Current Indexing Status: Not currently indexed for MEDLINE. Only articles related to space life sciences were indexed.”
Fwiw I’m going to include all the links I can in my posts from now on!
It looks like ResearchGate is also making strides to provide social metrics and indicies for ones scientific impact
http://www.researchgate.net/profile.RGScoreFAQ.html